Sent to the Clerk
of the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit via Registered Mail,
Return Receipt Requested, # RA785456818US
Nos.00-3305
and 00-3570
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO,
ILLINOIS
ROBERT E. KOLODY )
Plaintiff-Appellant / MOVANT
)
vs. )
SIMON MARKETING, INC. and )
COCA COLA COMPANY )
Defendants-Appellees /
RESPONDENTS )
Appeal
from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern
Division, Judge Blanche M. Manning, Presiding. District Court No. 97 C 190
NOTICE OF MOTION
To: All those on attached Service
List:
Be informed that on
September 22, 2003, Robert E. Kolody, plaintiff-appellant/MOVANT, pro se,
caused to be sent to the Clerk of the above Court, 1 Original plus 3 Copies to
be filed, by Registered Mail, with Return Receipt Requested, this Notice of
Motion, Declaration and Proof of Service, set out below, and attached Motion,
and Exhibits thereto attached all herewith served upon you and each of you.
____________________________________________
Robert E. Kolody,
plaintiff-appellant/MOVANT, pro se
223 St. Andrews Dr. Schererville,
In. 46375
(219) 865-9880
DECLARATION OF ROBERT E. KOLODY
and Proof of Service
Under the penalties of
perjury, pursuant to law, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1746,
undersigned declares and certifies as follows:
1. That he understands that
this instrument, pursuant to 28 C.S.C.A. Sec. 1746 has the same full force and
effect as if an Affidavit sworn to before a Notary Public.
2. That he has personal
knowledge of the matters in the attached Motion, and that they are true and
correct to his personal knowledge, or, are matters of record or of law and in
either case, are true.
3. That he is causing above
Notice of Motion with Exhibits thereto attached”, to be served upon those above
shown, by sending them the same by Certified U.S. Mail, Return receipt.
Requested, on September 22, 2003.
This instrument Executed on:
September 22, 2003
__________________________________________
Robert E. Kolody
COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS
Part One of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
Part One of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
This series going to deal with the following:
===Cocaine and Coca-Cola ===Coca-Cola and the espionage/mafia
cartel ===Coca-Cola's reputed spy apparatus inside their enemy's camp in an
important unpublicized blockbuster court case against the soda pop monster
===malign if not corrupt influence on the Courts ===Coca-Cola as "Big
Brother" and the Echelon worldwide spy machine.
From the beginning, Coca-Cola always had a trace of cocaine. Early
in the 20th Century it became part of a now forgotten prosecution of the soda
bubble water drink. Over the years, doctors treating stomach ailments quietly
used a mixture containing Coca-Cola syrup base. Of course, NOT used by doctors,
who knew the score, was the base for Pepsi-Cola, Royal Crown Cola, or for that
matter, any of the other fizz drinks. Savvy sorts, when they ran short of
Drano, knew to pour Coca-Cola down their home plumbing. The acids in Coke
cleared the plumbing almost as good as the high-priced hardware store stuff.
Nutritionists raised their eyebrows. What does Coca-Cola do to the human
plumbing?
Coke advertised with scenes of sports stars, speed boat
enthusiasts, and such. To give the impression that Coke adds to a vibrant,
healthy life. Yet Coke rightfully cannot make any nutrition claims. At least
that is what their critics swear by and swear at.
Hey, how come Drano and other pipe-uncloggers, do not also
advertise with speed boat pictures, sports stars, and such?
Some years ago, I interviewed on tape, a top official of the firm
that makes the secret Coca-Cola base. That is Stepan Chemical, headquartered in
the north suburb of Chicago, Northfield, and with plants elsewhere. They are
the largest importer in the western world of coca leaves, used for Coke's base.
A by-product, as admitted by the Stepan boss, is cocaine sold by them to the
pharmaceutical industry. Does any of it also slip by as contraband? In the
1970s, some alternative journalists began heckling cocaine-linked Stepan
Chemical. He said he was aware of the criticism of Stepan regarding cocaine. He
could not go into it too far, he said, because of reasons of "national
security". Or did he really mean, "Stepan security"? The bosses
of Stepan have always been close to the Daley family that since the mid-1950s,
with just a short hiatus, runs Chicago's city hall machine.
Early on in their history, The Coca-Cola Company assisted the U.S.
in espionage. When the company set up bottling plants and distribution
facilities in a new country, sent in were spy operatives.
The place to hang their hat was the offices and plants, worldwide,
of the much ballyhooed drink. The cocaine trace made it addictive.
So did the sugar content, according to some nutritionist. With the
U.S. Senate subcommittee hearings on Iran-Contra late in the 1980,s, the
CIA-Coca-Cola link was dealt with. In Nicaragua, for example, those with CIA,
when the Senate subcommittee asked, where with local offices of The Coca-Cola
Company. By the end of the 20th Century, Coke bought about a billion dollars a
year in advertisements in the monopoly press, even more when you add up their so-called
"independent" subsidiaries.
Coke reportedly uses worldwide, mafia-type strong-arms to assure
distribution and wreck competitors. Such as making soda pop competitors'
refrigerator units in stores to over-night, disappear. In some places it is the
traditional Sicilian and Italian mafia. In other places, former Soviet Secret
Police agents the KGB, like in the U.S. and current Russia, called the mafiya.
Elsewhere used reportedly are the numerous Japanese underworld, the Yakuza.
Feeding on lush revenue of Coke ads, the press whores are not about
to run news items or documentaries pointing out the reportedly close link
between The Coca-Cola Company, covert operations of the American CIA, and the
criminal cartel.
A key player, reportedly combining covert operations and the soda
pop, was Roberto Goizueta. A Cuban, he started with the firm at their Havana
offices in 1954. From 1980 to about the time of his death in 1997, Goizueta was
at the helm of the spy-pop witches brew, operating in most every place on the
globe. Through stock options he became a billionaire.
Goizueta's father was a Cuban sugar plantation dictator. Cuba was
the major source of cane sugar used in the cola drink. Because of the ferment
for change, needed was a new front man in Cuba. Batista, and the mafia, and the
wealthy criminal families sucking the sugar blood out of Cuba, had overplayed
their hand. So the American CIA, with the help of their reputed Atlanta-based
adjunct, The Coca-Cola Company, installed their darling, Fidel Castro, a popular
hero. When, like Frankenstein's monster, he turned against his creators, they
plotted to overthrow Castro and assassinate him. It was 1961 and it was called
the Bay of Pigs operation. The Coca-Cola Company and other old-time imperial
firms having an entrenched interest to have Cuba as a puppet colony,
participated with CIA. Aiding them was Claire Boothe Luce, wife of the boss of
the Time-Life Magazine empire. With the American CIA actually since 1959,
through his espionage front, Zapata Petroleum, was George Herbert Walker Bush.
He aided as well the aborted mission. One of the attempted invasion vessels was
named after Bush's operations. Out of official government office was Richard
Milhous Nixon. In 1961, he was the overlord for the planned invasion. Blamed
for the aborted invasion planned actually by President Eisenhower, President
John F. Kennedy said as a punishment, he would scatter the CIA to the wind. CIA
boss Allen Dulles, sacked by JFK, called him a "traitor". Some say
the JFK threats against CIA led to the plot to assassinate him.
Some would simplify this story by pointing to Coke trying to change
over greatly to a diet cola, as a way of breaking loose of filling the void
once supplied by Cuban cane sugar, against which there was a U.S. embargo. By
the end of the 20th Century, the major player in supplying the chemical
sweeteners for non-Diet Coke, was Archer-Daniels-Midland. At the time of
Watergate, the head of ADM was to have been prosecuted for secret participation
in Nixon's covert operations slush fund. Dwayne Andreas was too useful to the
American CIA for them to allow him to be jailed. Like The Coca-Cola Company in
the past, by 1999, ADM had an interest in putting their claws on Cuba. Through
foreign subsidiaries, ADM had big investments in operating food refineries in
Cuba, to exploit their agriculture abundance. ADM was the principal player for
the faked propaganda bombardment and orchestrated event, to open up Cuba and
drop the U.S. embargo. It was called the Elian Gonzalez affair. Only one lesser
known publication dared spell out the ADM-Cuba-Elian Gonzalez link. In the
spring of 2000, under a headline "How Did ADM Pull This Off?", The
Massachusetts News started their blockbuster item with "What is
Archer-Daniels-Midland and why does it want to build another food refinery in
Cuba? Where does it get its power?" The article went on to lambast ADM,
"The company is a speculator in and processor of corn and other grains
around the world. It has tremendous influence on politicians AND THE MEDIA."
(Emphasis added.) So the Elian Gonzalez affair was just a smoke screen. The
story quotes Forbes Magazine 2/7/2000, and their headline "ADM PREPARES
FOR LIFTING OF CUBAN EMBARGO". Note ADM sponsors many of the mass media's
TV talk shows as well as PBS's "Jim Lehrer News Hour".
The story of ADM and The Coca-Cola Company and a corrupt Chicago
Federal Judge will be in a later part of this series.
A major player in The Coca-Cola Company has been Warren Buffet. If
you are naive and believe in fairy tales, then you believe he made his great
fortune through crafty operation starting with a department store in Omaha. To
heckle him, some of his critics pronounce his name,French-style, phonetically
Buffay. Buffet became a major owner of Coke stock and held a position on their
Board of Directors. Few, if any, dare even whisper that Buffet's fortune is
reportedly based on operating companies that are money laundries and propaganda
horns for the American CIA. The list would have to include CIA adjuncts such as
the Wells Fargo Bank, helping CIA's Pacific basin operations, and the
CIA-apologist, The Washington Post Company. (Read, if you can find it, Deborah
Davis' book, "Katherine the Great" about the Washington Post and the
CIA.
To understand Warren Buffet, who mouths off his wonders at
universities training so-called would-be business stars, you would have to be a
profound investigator, from mostly secret sources, on the worldwide dope
trafficking by the American CIA. When you are knowledgeable on that, then, and
only then, do you understand the financial buffoon, Warren Buffet. Is it a mere
coincidence that his purported nephew, Jimmy Buffet, and his rock concerts seem
to be part of making dope use fashionable? His band, The Corral Reefers, is a
word play for narcotics.
At his concerts, there is reportedly massive trafficking and use of
dope. And the local corrupted police have the badge of the three monkeys.
Some had misgivings about another purported relative of Warren
Buffet, the once popular Art Bell, the middle-of-the-night talk show host. Bell
was broadcasted on hundreds of major wattage radio stations in major markets,
never known to broadcast the truth about the Federal Reserve, or political
assassinations, and a lot of other suppressed topics. With his reputed heavy
intelligence agency background, was Bell's program just some more psychological
warfare operations? In crude terms, was it just mindf--k?
Late in the 20th Century, a strange series of events started
targeting The Coca-Cola Company. Various European governments and the European
Union began attacking Coke.===That Coke's products in Europe are contaminated.
Such as in Belgium and Poland, among others.===That The Coca-Cola Company usesw
monopoly tactics to injure competitors. Such as in Italy.===Dawn raids on
Coke's offices and closing down their plants, grabbing up records and accusing
The Coca-Cola Company of making people sick with their products.
Is there a simple, though incomplete, unpublicized explanation for
this epidemic of attacks on The Coca-Cola Company? The French CIA accused
Microsoft of being a spy operation and proprietary adjunct of the super-secret
U.S. National Security Agency, the signal intelligence spooks. Further, France
and other European copuntries are accusing The Coca-Cola Company of being, like
Microsoft, an adjunct and private company proprietary of the American CIA.
Privitizing some of CIA's operations makes it impossible to get possibly
incriminating records, if at all, through invoking the U.S. Freedom of
Information Act. You cannot force government disclosure, for example, of CIA's
private company proprietary adjunct, Wackenhut, a alter ego for CIA with more
emplopyes and operations that CIA itself. )Spy Magazine, 9/92.)
Further, France and other European countries are accusing Coke of
using some of their methods and satellite operations to assist and as a cover
for Echelon, the super "Big Brother" gobbling up most everyone's
private details and tracking, through key words, what most everyone
communicates with anyone else in the world.
Raiding Coke's European plants and offices---claiming anti-trust
violations and poisoning up the populace---is just another way of sending the
Atlanta-based spy/soda-spitting rattlesnake the message We do not like American
spies and vipers.
COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS
Part Two of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
Part Two of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
COCA-COLA's reputed spies and
the corrupt Federal Witness Protection Program
First, a short lesson in court corruption.
First, a short lesson in court corruption.
How do a series of secretly related court cases get onto the docket
of one Judge? As a case is in the process of being filed in the federal
district court clerk's office, the case, under the rules, is supposed to be
assigned by random selection, "blindman's buff" they used to call it.
But, after studying and investigating court corruption for over 40 years, I
know the term to be used is RANDOM MAGIC.
One of the first things we probe when we are on the trail of a
tainted or suspicious case is How did THIS particular case get on THAT judge's
docket? We know from long experience, corruption starts with the assignment of
cases. Another tell-tale sign is when THAT judge uses JUDICIAL PERJURY to
"fix" the case in favor of a certain litigant. A judge under a malign
if not corrupt influence inserts false so-called "facts" plucked out
of the sky and not in the court evidence to justify their decision. In
simplistic terms, the undisputed court evidence shows it is DAY.
Operating under a corrupt influence, the judge proclaims it is
NIGHT, and applies case law regarding NIGHT to support her decision. Judges
operate by case law, that is, by prior landmark rulings or statutes which
cannot obviously be changed or sidestepped that easily. So the corrupted judge
changes the "facts" and applies case law to fraudulent facts. That in
essence is judicial perjury. Not every case is the subject of malign influence.
But, often the important ones are. Over the years, when we suspected a judge
was corrupt, we examined their rulings to see if there are judicial perjuries.
An honest judge, mis-stating the undisputed facts, would quickly correct wrong
statements. A crooked judge, even when confronted (cowardly lawyers are
chicken), refuses.
Of the more than two dozen judges sitting in Chicago's U.S.
District Court, one judge, by some witchcraft, has assigned to her a string of
cases with apparent concealed links. That is Judge Blanche M. Manning
[(312)435-7608]. Among these, she has assigned to her, by apparent RANDOM
MAGIC, the case of Robert E. Kolody vs. Simon Marketing and The Coca-Cola
Company, No. 97 C 190. For a number of years Kolody planned to sue Coke for
stealing his intellectual property, designs he made for them. Kolody's
confidant, who befriended him over the years and insinuated himself into the
matter for some 10 years has been a local lawyer who was always sympathetic to
Kolody's grievances against Coca-Cola and their adjunct, Simon Marketing. When
Kolody retained an out-of-state attorney from Arkansas to represent him in
1998, the rules required the designation of an additional lawyer as "local
counsel". That trusted "local counsel" was Kolody's long-time
confidant Daniel V. Hanley, [(708)474-6633], of the Chicago suburb of Lansing,
Illinois.
All of Kolody's legal strategies and plans and those of his
Arkansas lawyer, Dan Ivy, were discussed in confidence with Daniel V. Hanley.
But strange things were happening. Coke's lawyers seemed to be able to
"beat to the punch" Kolody and Dan Ivy, that is, heading off Kolody
and Ivy's legal strategies which, of course, are confidential and not to be
divulged by his "local counsel" Daniel V. Hanley.
And Judge Blanche M. Manning arrogantly committed judicial
perjuries, which some common people call straight out lies about what this
copyright case was all about. The Judge evidently knew that she did not have to
be careful. She refused to wipe out her judicial perjuries when confronted by
Dan Ivy.
As an electronic journalist, on May 18,2000, I attended a hearing
before Judge Manning when she failed to do anything about her judicial
perjuries in the Coca-Cola case. Afterwards elsewhere in the courthouse in the
presence of Ivy, I interviewed Daniel V. Hanley
"Skolnick What sort of law work do you do, Mr. Hanley? Daniel
V. Hanley General. Skolnick As you know I do for many years now a Cable TV Show
each week. Hanley Yes, I know. Skolnick Does Coca-Cola and their attorneys know
the legal strategy of Robert Kolody and his attorney Dan Ivy here? Hanley Yes.
Skolnick Really? How could they know? Hanley My sister is the media buyer for Coca-Cola.
Skolnick What does she do? Hanley She has been with a New York firm and now is
in Chicago. Skolnick What firm is she with? Hanley (looked at Skolnick but did
not answer.)
Skolnick Do you think putting Bob here on my TV program about
Coca-Cola would do any good? Hanley No. Skolnick So your sister understands all
about this case?
Hanley Yes."
"Whereupon Daniel V. Hanley left and Skolnick spoke to Dan
Ivy. Skolnick Did you hear what Hanley volunteered as a statement? (Kolody had
come over to the table and heard the portion, he said, of the colloquy where
Daniel V. Hanley said his sister is media buyer for Coca-Cola.) Dan Ivy Yes,
and we are shocked. Skolnick Well, this needs further investigation now that he
volunteered this statement."
After another court hearing on July 6, 2000, when again Judge
Manning failed to take back her judicial perjuries, I attended in court and
interviewed Hanley again in the presence of Dan Ivy. "Skolnick So, do you
think putting Bob on my TV Show will do some good? Hanley No. The time to put
him on would have been two years ago at the time of the summary judgment. It's
too late now. Skolnick So Coca-Cola understands all about this case, through
your sister. Hanley Yes. Whereupon, Hanley left."
The foregoing transcripts are contained in my signed Declaration
attached to Kolody's Motion for the Judge to wipe out all her rulings of
substance because of the Fraud Upon the Court by the Judge and Coca-Cola's spy
in Kolody's camp for ten years. [Motion filed 8/9/2000, in No. 97 C 190.]
As I later discovered, Daniel V. Hanley's sister, Mary Hanley, is
Associate Media Director [(312) 552-6368] of the huge, worldwide advertising
firm, DDB. [Visit their websitehttp//www.ddb.com and click on their world
directory of personnel for Chicago and Mary Hanley.]
As I put in my Declaration in Court "The long-term custom,
practice, and usage, in certain parts of the U.S. to purportedly purchase
federal judgeships, has been a subject of investigations and commentaries by
Skolnick and his closest associates, from 1966 to the present date. Skolnick
has such a commentary on his website, http//www.skolnicksreport.com ,
.Knowledgeable sources have informed Skolnick that the upwards of one million
dollars to purportedly purchase the judgeship for Blanche M. Manning came from
William F. Cellini via U.S. Senator Carol Moseley-Braun. Law enforcement
personnel contend to Skolnick that Cellini, heavily active in gambling casinos,
is reporrtedly a key player in the crime cartel."
More details from my court Declaration
"Skolnick jointly with some of his associates in court reform,
have been investigating the circumstances of a case pending before Judge
Manning USA vs. Joseph Jerome Miedzianowski, et al., defendants, No. 98 CR 923,
U.S. District Court,Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The
circumstances show
(a) Judge Manning, many times without notice conducted closed door
and secret proceedings in the case;
(b) ordered the censoring, by redacting of court and other
transcripts;
(c) Chicago Tribune Company petitioned, to intervene in the case as
of right, for among other purposes, for access to sealed judicial records and
transcripts of proceedings;
(d) Chicago Tribune apparently never publicly disclosed their
objections to the secret proceedings in the case. Some references to this
situjation are contained in the case in No.98 CR 923, among other items, docket
items No. 174, 175, 176 , 180, 182, 186, 192."
More "Informed sources contend that this situation is due, in
part, to matters actually or bordering on so-called 'national security', in
that involved in the trafficking of dope into Chicago from Florida and
elsewhere was the use of dope couriers or 'mules' as they are known, of
persons, some of them women, who also did work for the espionage
agencies."
More "Daniel V. Hanley has also been the attorney for Danny
Harkenrider, who owns and operates Shannon's Landing, an Irish Pub, located
with the property of the Chicago suburban airport in Lansing, Illinois. The
place has been a reputed center for dope trafficking, inclujding through
airplanes. Nothing is done about this by the usual dope enforcement
authorities. FBI Division Five, Counter-Intelligence, has informed the U.S.
Drug Enforcement Administration, and other state and federal agencies, to take
no action against the dope traffice. The excuse being that the FBI purportedly
is tracking clandestine IRS activities through the airport and the said Pub;
activities to raise funds for the IRS and gun-smuggling through the dope
traffic. Harkenrider has had purported immunity in these acts and doings in
thast his sister, Mary Yokich, was at one time on the third level from the top
of the U.S. Justice Department, engaged in special investigations including
involved in the Oklahoma City bombings. Some contend the Justice Department and
the FBI, to avoid embarassing details coming out, suppressed details of the
tragedy. Mary Yokich's father-in-law is head of the powerful United Auto
Workers union which in the past has throu9gh international affiliates, assisted
the American CIA in covert operations against unions deemed unfriendly to
American corporate interests worldwide."
Well-informed sources contend that one of the reasons Daniel V.
Hanley volunteered the statement mentioned is that Hanley and his client,
Harkenrider, are reportedly in the Federal Witness Prortection Program, or
being considered to be taken in under the criteria set forth in the U.S.
Justice Department Manual under the Witness Security Reform Act of 1984 jointly
with other laws. Sources contend that Hanley and Harkenrider, because of their
activities at the Irish Pub, at the Lansing, Illinois Airport, are being
threatened from all sides
(a) by the IRA not to co-operate with FBI Counter-Intelligence,
Division Five, as protected witnesses;
(b) by their knowledge that Judge Manning is keeping out of the
federal court record in several of her cases, the corrupt operation of the
Federal Witness Protection Program, and that Hanley and Harkenrider cannot
expect to be actually protected as witnesses;
(c) By The Coca-Cola Company, in that they have had an entrenched
spy in the camp of a major copyright case, where Robert E. Kolody is suing
Coca-Cola and their marketing adjunct Simon Marketing now merged with a firm
called Cryk;
(d) by various corporate interests whose planes apparently convey
dope in and out of the Lansing, Illinois airport with impunity, with stste and
federal authorities playing the part of the three monkeys; (e) and threatened
by the Drug Enforcement Administration agents who often occupy a table at
Shannon's Landing and also play the part of the three monkeys.
It is perhaps ironic that the only non-threatening type that Hanley
could confess to is Sherman H. Skolnick, a long-known, independent-minded court
reformer and Cable TV Talk Show moderator/producer. Much more about Chicago
Federal District Judge Blanche M. Manning and the highly-corrupt Federal
Witness Protection Program involved in a string of cases she is covering up.
COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS
Part Three of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
Part Three of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
This series is dealing with the type of harsh realities uncovered
by our research and investigation group over 4 arduous decades of our work.
1. Sometimes whole groups of court cases are assigned, not by
random selection, but random magic, intentionally to one or more judges part of
"big fix". And involved is a malign, if not corrupt, influence upon
the judge. Knowing who it is that bought the chair for the Judge is one type of
influence. Straight out bribery, another. And the major corruption, as we have
repeatedly shown, is not in the state courts, but the big bucks federal courts.
We have been showing as an example a group of cases assigned to Chicago U.S.
District Judge Blanche M. Manning [(312) 435-7608. FAX (312) 435-7578.] We have
more details on her. And she is not the only one, just an example of the
corrupted federal judiciary.
2. Worldwide, major enterprises are secret adjuncts of the American
CIA. Privatizing the spy agency avoids Freedom of Information disclosures. One
example is Wackenhut. An example dealt with here is The Coca-Cola Company.
3. Government agencies are supposedly set up to protect witnesses
from harm in very sensitive case. For instance, the Federal Witness Protection
Program. But they seem to have been penetrated by criminal interests, so that
key witnesses, that finger corruption of top IRS and DEA officials, are NOT
protected, but terrorized, and on occasion, snuffed out. As we have specified,
Judge Manning is covering up this situation in the case of USA vs. John Serpico
et al., No. 99 CR 570. Serpico, a union purported criminal boss, is reportedly
a business partner with a top official of the Federal Witness Protection
Program.
4. There are places that operate reportedly as a criminal immunity
zone. Anything goes. The state and federal authorities play the part of the
three monkeys. One such that seems to fit that description, reportedly is a
business on the property of the Lansing, Illinois Airport, a suburb of Chicago.
Called Shannon's Landing [(708) 895-6919], it is an Irish pub. Who seems to use
that place? Corrupt top IRS officials blackmailing their way into all kinds of
deals. [Visit our website series on the crooked IRS bosses and their
ocean-going money laundry boat, "California Rose".] Dope traffic
through the airplanes there and such is used reportedly to raise funds for
gun-smuggling, for purposes of the Irish Republican Army, IRA. Agents of the
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration often sit at that pub and hear and see
nothing. The owner of the pub, Danny Harkenrider, is reportedly himself in the
Federal Witness Protection Program or being considered under the criteria for
such.
Another one in that program reportedly or being considered for
such, is a purported lawyer {he does not seem to practice much law), Daniel V.
Hanley, of Lansing, Illinois [(708) 474-6633].
Hanley is a purported spy inside the camp of a fellow, Robert E.
Kolody, who sued Coke for theft of storyboards and designs, that is, his
intellectual property. Apparently threatened from all sides, Hanley as the
supposed "local counsel" for Kolody, confessed and volunteered to me,
in the presence of witnesses, that Kolody's court opponent, The Coca-Cola Company,
gets to know his confidential legal strategies through Hanley's sister, Mary
Hanley, who is the media buyer for Coca-Cola. She is with a huge worldwide
advertising agency in Chicago, DDB [(312) 552-6368. FAX (312) 552-2394. E-Mail
MaryHanley@chi.ddb.com].
5. Federal judgeships, like state judgeships, are bought and sold.
A known reputed criminal type bought Judge Blanche M. Manning the federal
judge's bench and chair she occupies in the U.S. District Court in Chicago.
[Visit our website for our story on Buying Judgeships.] A million dollars or
more was laid out.
6. A major dope trafficking case, by random magic, was assigned to
Judge Manning. She covered up the involvement of "mules", dope
couriers, some of them women, who also do espionage for the American CIA. USA
vs. Joseph Jerome Miedzianowski et al., No. 98 CR 923. The Chicago Tribune are
fakers. As shown in the court record they are privately blackmailing Judge
Manning, lambasting her for holding without notice or formalities, secret
proceedings, censoring court transcripts and papers. Why does the WORLD'S
GREEDIEST NEWSPAPER remain silent about all this in print or on their TV
Station in Chicago, Channel 9, WGN-TV, or on their radio horn WGN Radio?
7. In an extremely important anti-trust conspiracy case assigned to
her, again by random magic, Judge Manning tried to go easy on top officials
found guilty by a jury; top officials, that is, of the worldwide farm products
refinery, Archer-Daniels-Midland. ADM is a super-duper advetiser in the monopoly
press and controls numerous TV talk shows and such. They have as their puppet
the "Jim Lehrer News Hour" on PBS. And ADM is big with supposedly
"non-commercial" radio stations, NPR. Since a Rockefeller holds the
key position with NPR, we call them National Petroleum Radio. ADM, like
Coca-Cola years ago, is trying to put a grab on Cuba's agriculture by forcing
the U.S. to drop the embargo.
By the way, the whole Elian Gonzalez Affair, played out on the
ADM-dominated monopoly press, was to soften up the American know-nothings for
ADM's scheme being big investments in Cuba in food refineries to take advantage
of Cuba's agriculture abundance. Working on the other side of this propaganda
trick reportedly was Jose Basulto, reportedly tied to the criminal combine that
includes the family of George Herbert Walker Bush and his criminal-linked,
oil-soaked sons. And linked to the American CIA.
The case of the ADM officials is USA vs. Michael D. Andreas,
Terrance S. Wilson, and Mark E. Whitacre. Michael is the son of the long-time
ADM dictator Dwayne Andreas who should have gone to jail in the Watergate
Affair. The government whistle-blower, Whitacre, himself an ADM official, wore
a wire, and aided the FBI in setting up clandestine video and audio recording
of the monopoly crimes. He was done in apparently with the connivance---here it
comes again---of the Federal Witness Protection Program. It is case No. 96 CR
762.
After a jury verdict finding the defendants guilty, Judge Manning
nevertheless gave a light sentence to Andreas and Wilson and a more severe jail
sentence to the whistle-blower, Whitacre, to scare such finger-pointers to shut
up in the future or be dropped down the chute by the criminal-combine running
the Federal Witness Protection Program. And as mentioned, Judge Manning in
various cases is covering up the criminals supposedly dedicated to protecting
government witnesses, actually persecuting and terrorizing key government
witnesses. If that does not work, well, snuffing out witnesses is also the
answer. Whitacre rots in jail.
In June, 2000, the banker-judges on the federal appeals court in
Chicago, did their own blackmail job on Judge Manning. They publicly ran over
her in the case of Andreas and Wilson. They want to be sure she stays shut on
the corrupted Federal Witness Protection Program in the several cases put on
her docket by random magic. The appeals judges, primarily tied to the
Rockefeller interests and not ADM, slapped her down, saying she gave too light
of jail sentences to Andreas and Wilson, and sent it back for her to fix it up.
Whitacre was not part of the appeal and is left as a thrown-in-the-garbage
whistle-blower.
ADM supplies the corn and other sweeteners to The Coca-Cola
Company. So you see the common link to the cases on Judge Manning's docket. ADM
is a spy-apparatus themselves, just like Coke. In 1989, ADM wanted to put an
armlock on the Chicago Board of Trade and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. They
were countered by the independent-minded young "pirates" who as
speculators were running the places. ADM arranged to "buy" the
federal prosecutors office to frame up 46 of these "pirates" on
measly five dollar discrepancy matters. In an unusual procedure, ADM supplied
to the federal government prosecutors undercover spies, trained by and for ADM
in commodity and other dealing. ADM's undercover provocateurs got
"evidence" of the five dollar matters which was and is a common,
accepted practice on the exchanges, not considered a crime at all. The federal
prosecutors, practically on ADM's payroll instead of Uncle Sam's, destroyed the
46 young people quicker than shooting them.
In 1992, I was sitting in my wheelchair in the front of the front
row of the packed courtroom of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago. Before the
oral presentation of the appeals, I tried to tell the wives of some of the
Soybean Ten, that the three-judge panel to hear the appeal, was headed by a
conflict of interest. That was Federal Appeals Judge Richard D. Cudahy.
According to his mandatory financial disclosure, he is the richest judge in
North America and owns and operates the Patrick Cudahy Trust, which is a
speculation instrument in the commodity industry. Judge Cudahy upheld the
severe jail sentences of the soybean traders.
The relatives of the doomed speculators had hired, for about a
million dollars, Alan Dershowitz, to argue their appeal. Before the hearing,
when I tried to warn the relatives, they just insulted me "Who the hell
are you, Mr. Skolnick? I answered, I am just a voice for justice in the wilderness,
that's all."
Hey, maybe you are floored by all these details. Maybe I should not
tell you that the Russian mafiya plays a part in some of Judge Manning's
crooked decisions. Like Harkenrider is purportedly in with them.
Part Four of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
by Sherman H. Skolnick
Is the media monster. the Tribune Company, a reputed blackmailer of
The Coca-Cola Company?
Here is more that is boiling and bubbling out of that witches brew
of a scandal implicating Coca-Cola. For background to this story, you should
visit our website story about the Chicago Tribune linked to the criminal
cartel, at least from 1910 to date, including the Trib using Al Capone as a
labor consultant in 1930 to beat back a strike against the Tribune, and then
again, in 1986, using gangster goons with attack dogs against the Trib's own
workers in a labor strike.
With a charter for their Canadian pulp from the King of England
more than a 100 years ago, and large ownership currently by the Queen of
England and her dope traffickers, the Tribune Company are no angels. Neither
are the Coca-Cola Company as an adjunct worldwide of the American CIA. The one who
got in the middle between the Tribune Company and Coca-Cola is Chicago U.S.
District Judge Blanche M. Manning [(312) 435-7608]. In a theft of intellectual
property case pending against Coca-Cola, Judge Manning has issued a series of
"judicial perjuries", as some call them, to corruptly favor Coke.
[Robert E. Kolody vs. Simon Marketing and The Coca-Cola Company, 97 C 190.]
Plain-spoken folks call such things straight out lies by the Judge.
In August, 2000, Judge Manning was confronted with a situation involving
a spy infiltrating the camp of Coke's court opponent, Kolody, thus becoming
privy to Kolody's confidential legal strategies against Coke. How did this
happen, as identified in the Court record? Following a court hearing, I
interviewed Kolody's required "local counsel" in the presence of
Kolody's out-of-state counsel Dan Ivy
"Skolnick Does Coca-Cola and their attorneys know the legal
strategies of Robert Kolody and his attorney Dan Ivy here? Local counsel Daniel
V. Hanley [(708) 474-6633] Yes. Skolnick Really? How could they know? Hanley
My sister is the media buyer for Coca-Cola." [Portion of transcript of
interview attached to Motion for Relief Because of Fraud Upon the Court, filed
8/9/00. The term "fraud upon the court" is a profound principle of
law that frightens cowardly members of the bar and corrupt members of the
bench. It requires that the rulings on matters of substance by a judge acting
under a malign, if not corrupt, influence, be expunged from the court record.]
When I run into savvy cynics in or near courthouses, they just
cackle. "Skolnick, you have often documented such problems. How can there
be a fraud upon the District Court in places like Chicago, a court that is a
long-known fraud itself?"
To try to get around Kolody's Motion for Relief Because of Fraud
Upon the Court, Judge Manning issued a decision giving the Motion a false
label, calling it a motion to disqualify the Judge. There is no such thing in
the Motion. But this is typical of judges operating under a malign, if not
corrupt, influence. [A gambling casino kingpin, reportedly part of the criminal
cartel, reportedly paid one million dollars to BUY the federal judgeship for
Manning. As stated in the filed Motion. Visit our web stories also about Buying
a Judgeship.]
And falsely calling the Motion by that name, Judge Manning said
Kolody did not properly invoke the federal statutes for disqualifying a judge.
So the Judge said Kolody's Motion is no good. Any one examining the Court
record could see the Judge is a plain rotten liar.
In another case on Judge Manning's docket, the Tribune Company has
been blackmailing the Judge. In a moment you will understand why.
It is a case of a dope-trafficking gang, Chicago-Florida, involving
Chicago police and dope "mules" or couriers, actually many of them
women also working for the American CIA. The Tribune filed a petition in the
case saying they should be allowed to intervene as of right. Why? Because, says
the Tribune, Judge Manning is conducting, without notice or legal formality,
secret court proceedings. And Judge Manning is censoring court documents and
transcripts, by redacting them, and similar secret methods. Judge Manning's
apparent purpose? To cover up the dope trafficking showing complicity by
corrupt top-level IRS officials, and the kinky U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration, and the corrupted FBI, among others. [Visit our web series on
corrupt IRS brass and their ocean-going money laundry boat.]
The dope trafficking case is USA vs. Joseph Jerome Miedzianowski,
et al., No. 98 CR 923, U.S. District Court, Chicago.
According to advertising agency sources, The Tribune Company, as a
media empire, has a beef against The Coca-Cola Company which is being corruptly
favored by Judge Manning with her paper tricks. [Kolody vs. Simon Marketing and
The Coca-Cola Company, No. 97 C 190.] The Tribune Company is sore at Coke
because Coke's media buyer, Mary Hanley, reportedly is not favoring Trib and
their raft of newspapers, TV and radio stations and such, with the proper
amount of advertising bucks. Get this straight the Tribune, no crusaders
against corrupt federal judges, does not wish to assist Kolody but rather to
strong-arm Coke.
Just after the Fraud Upon the Court Motion is filed, Mary Hanley's
boss, the monstrous DDB advertising octopus, announces, in the Chicago Tribune,
that Mary Hanley has been promoted to Senior Vice President and is group media
director at DDB Chicago. [Chicago Tribune, George Lazarus' column, 8/15/00.] It
appears that DDB is playing the part of press agent, to try to get the stink
off the mess.
And guess what? To further get away from the ruckus, Coca-Cola's
media buyer, Mary Hanley, identified as such by her lawyer-brother, just at
that point, is leaving the U.S. for Ireland. [Mary Hanley (312) 552-6368. E-Mail
MaryHanley@chi.ddb.com]
By the way, reportedly arranging such propaganda is an apparatus we
call The Banquet Committee, suddenly honoring someone, such as person of the
year and such, to counter a scandal. More later.
We have, by the way, been commenting for some 40 years about media
units blackmailing slow-to-comply would-be advertisers. The late George Seldes,
a crusading journalist, wrote about this type of blackmailing in his book,
"Tell The Truth and Run". Since 1991, in our public access Cable TV
Program in Chicago, we have spelled out numerous examples of pressfakers using
blackmail to strong-arm ads. That is, threatening to run negative stories about
a corporation if they fail to buy plenty of ads.
In simple terms, the Tribune Company wants The Coca-Cola Company to
throw more ad bucks its way. And twisting Judge Manning's crooked arm [maybe
even Mary Hanley's arm] is the way to start the finger pointing leading to
loosening up Coke's billion dollar a year advertising bankroll. [Some years ago,
we showed how a local TV station in Chicago, Channel 5, WMAQ-TV, an NBC unit,
did a series scandalizing Sears Roebuck & Co., basically because Sears was
holding back ad bucks.]
And get this angle The Miedzianowski case secretly involves the
American CIA, details covered up by Judge Manning. The background of many of
the Tribune Company's correspondents and such is that they come out of U.S.
Military Intelligence, the CIA's competitor. So the Tribune Company has a
number of reasons to privately blackmail Chicago U.S. District Judge Blanche M.
Manning.
Sarcastic sorts crow, if Coke does not bubble up with more ads for
the Tribune Company---well, Tribune may order any Coke machines to suddenly
disappear from Trib's premises. Or sternly order Tribune employees to drink
Royal Crown Cola instead. NOT Pepsi-Cola, falsely described as a
"competitor" of Coke, yet Coke and Pepsi are run and owned by the
same folks. Ha ha. Stories like this take the fizz out of the soda monster.
COCA-COLA, THE CIA, and the COURTS
Part Five of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
Part Five of a Series
by Sherman H. Skolnick
THE BLACKMAIL MACHINE ROLLS ON
It was set to be a crucial hearing in the media-ignored Coca-Cola
case in Chicago's federal district court. U.S. District Judge Blanche M.
Manning [(312) 435-7608] was determined NOT to hear in open court on August 22,
2000, that Coca-Cola had a reputed spy in the camp of their opponent, Robert E.
Kolody, who was sueing Coke for theft of his storyboards and designs. In law,
his claim is called theft of intellectual property.
The monopoly press, beholden to major advertiser Coca-Cola, has
purposely evaded reporting on this case. Kolody's out-of-state attorney, Dan
Ivy, had on August 9, bravely filed a Motion demanding the Judge expunge all
her rulings favoring Coke, since the reputed spy reportedly conveyed
confidential legal strategies of Kolody to his opponent, Coke. It is called
Fraud Upon the Court, an unusual procedure that makes most of those of the
bench and the bar plenty nervous. Kolody's required "local counsel",
Daniel V. Hanley, the reputed spy, in the presence of witnesses, had confessed
to me that Coca-Cola knew Kolody's court strategies because Hanley's sister is
media buyer for Coca-Cola.
The court-filed Motion with my signed Declaration attached, among
other things, pointed out [1] That power-broker, and gambling casino overlord,
WILLIAM F. CELLINI, reportedly paid one million dollars to buy in 1994 the
federal court judgeship for Blanche M. Manning. The pay-off reportedly made
through then-U.S. Senator Carol Moseley-Braun.
[Braun lost the re-election in 1998 because of growing scandlas she
could not explain away. As to Buying a Judgeship, visit my website.] Cellini
reportedly is linked to the nationwide criminal cartel. [2] My Declaration
transcribed two interviews, done in the presence of witnesses, of Daniel V.
Hanley. [3] That the Tribune Company, parent of the Chicago Tribune, and their
media empire, have been blackmailing Judge Manning by seeking to intervene, as
of right they claimed, without publicity, in another one of Judge Manning's
cases. To point out that the Judge engaged in secret proceedings without
notice, and censored and redacted court records, as part of an apparent
cover-up. As later determined, the Tribune Company wanted to pressure Judge
Manning, and Coke's media buyer, MARY HANLEY, so Tribune would get more
advertising bucks from Coca-Cola. With the merger with the Los Angeles Times,
Tribune Company got more heavily in debt. Getting a big share of Coke's billion
dollars a year advertising slush fund would help Tribune Company and their
banks.
Prior to the show-down August 22 hearing, Judge Manning jumped the
gun and rejected the Fraud Upon the Court Motion out of hand. The Judge issued
a ruling loaded with what Dan Ivy later on August 22, described in court to her
face, as her "judicial perjuries". Identified by Dan Ivy were how, to
try to cover up and evade, the Fraud Upon the Court, involving the Judge
herself, that she sraight out lied. The Judge falsely described the Motion as
one to disqualify herself. No such thing in the Motion. Ivy confronted the
Judge with a string of her lies. The Judge resisted allowing the witnesses
against the reputed spy to be heard. The witnesses were all present in the
courtroom.
Notice the time-line Prior to the key hearing, Daniel V. Hanley
informed Kolody that Hanley's sister, Coke media buyer Mary Hanley, is going
out of the country, to Ireland. Would she be available as a witness? Her
testimony could scandalize her company, DDB advertising agency, in matters that
involve both Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola. [More later.] Prior to the key hearing,
in a business column 8/15/00, in the Chicago Tribune, it is announced that Mary
Hanley of DDB Chicago has been elected Senior Vice President and is a group
media director.
By the way, as Coke's media buyer, Mary Hanley has tremendous clout
as to who in the mass media get part of Coke's billion dollars a year ad bucks.
After resisting hearing the witnesses, Judge Manning suddenly
leaves the bench, presumably to get instructions from "higher ups".
In the recess, six federal security patrol officers enter the Courtroom. An
excuse supposedly is that the Judge will briefly divert a few minutes to
sentence a jail-bird, in an orange prison jumpsuit, brought in through a side
door. After the brief diversion, however, the federal police do not leave.
Judge Manning then tries to intimidate me demanding I roll my wheelchair to the
rear of the courtroom. I told her I am an electronic journalist and wish to be
upfront to observe and hear good. One of the federal police stands up and
started over to me, to forcibly remove me. Under threat, I rolled over to sit
right near one of the federals with his intercom in his ear.
Suddenly the Judge changes her mind and the witnesses were called
such as me. I was asked what I do. Looking right at Judge Manning, I told her I
investigate crooked judges for the purpose of putting them in jail.
Pointing to the reputed spy for Coca-Cola who confessed to me in
the presence of others, I detailed what was said. The reputed spy did not,
however, appear to deny my interviews with him about his sister.
In the Kolody case, the two defendants are The Coca-Cola Company
and their marketing adjunct, Simon Marketing. Simon's alleged attorney was
asked why she did not inform the Court that Simon had merged and is now part of
Cyrk, Inc. The attorney, Jacqueline A. Criswell [law firm Tressler, Soderstrom,
Maloney & Priess(312) 627-4000] told Judge Manning that she did not know of
the merger.
Apparently not adequately revealed in the Court record is that
Criswell does NOT represent Simon Marketing but rather, the insurance carrier
under an errors and omission policy carried by many corporations. And the name
of the insurance company has not been disclosed in the Court record. Also, Cyrk
has reportedly failed to inform the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of
the Kolody suit as required by SEC regulations.
>From all the known facts, it appears that there may be a scam
underway to rip off the insurance carrier. No great surprise. Illinois and
Texas are havens for pirate insurance companies aand havens for massive
insurance frauds, because of crooked state insurance regulators. Coke appears
to be fraudulently shifting the multi-million dollar damage claim against them,
for theft of intellectual property, so their former marketing adjunct, Simon,
would take the blame to be underwritten by the insurance company.
Coca-Cola's advertising agency DDB, may be part of a huge
price-fixing and market-tampering mess. Advertising agencies become privy to
tremendous financial and political secrets of their clients. Such as the market
demographics. Data on profiling would-be customers. Price trends. Political
trends that effect marketing products.
Problems needed to be "fixed" and judges and others
necessary to be corrupted, for the benefit of their clients. Where the product
sells the best, so as to put a related business unit right nearby.
Point-of-purchase strategies.
Closely scrutinizing DDB's website is helpful http//www.ddbn.com
DDB, once called Needham, has been trying to stay low-key on the
fact that they represent PEPSI-COLA at the same time they represent their
alleged "competitor" COCA-COLA. That sort of an arrangement is both
unethical and may well be a violation of the U.S. Anti-Trust laws. The purpose
is to freeze out smaller companies like Royal Crown Cola and others, with Pepsi
and Coke together controlling the prices among themselves, dividing up markets
among themselves, setting the wholesale price per-case of soda pop in a way to
screw smaller firms, and then jacking up the price for themselves, and similar
federal price-fixing and market-fixing law violations. An open secret, never
mentioned in the monopoly press, is that Coke and Pepsi are substantially owned
and operated by the same people.
Two days after the key hearing on Coke's reputed spy, the Chicago
Tribune continues their Blackmail Machine. The apparent purpose is not to help
Robert E. Kolody fight the injustice inflicted on him by Judge Manning but
rather, for the Tribune Company to continue to shakedown Coke's advertising
agency, DDB, to get more ad bucks for the Tribune empire of numerous print
media newspapers, TV stations, radio stations, magazines, and a great number of
advertising-sponsored websites.
The Trib blackmail story was on their front page, 8/24/2000. The
Tribune announced a matter that had so far been kept secret That there had been
a huge Illinois State contract swindle prosecution that actually involved top
officials of then-Illinois Governor Jim Edgar [1991-1999] "The list of
those linked by prosecutors to the scandal but not charged included Michael
Belletire, Edgar's deputy chief of staff and later head of the ILLINOIS GAMING
BOARD; JANIS CELLINI, Edgar's patronage chief AND SISTER OF SPRINGFIELD POWER
BROKER WILLIAM CELLINI..." (Emphasis added.)
Notice the tie-in to the Coca-Cola case A gambling casino kingpin,
reputedly part of the nationwide crime cartel, William F. Cellini, reportedly
bought the Judgeship for Blanche M. Manning sitting in the Coca-Cola case. One
of those reportedly covering up dirty business in gambling casinos for Cellini
what later became head of the Illinois Gambing Board is now named as having
been an unindicted co-conspirator. That is, the prosecutor, splitting hairs because
of being corrupted or otherwise influenced, left him off the jhook. And then
the Tribune names William F. Cellini's sister, JANIS CELLINI, as one who
somehow escaped being actually prosecuted and jailed.
Do you suppose that William F. Cellini and the Coca-Cola gang and
their ad bucks controller DDB, and Mary Hanley, media buyer for Coca-Cola,
along with Judge Manning, got the message? See to it, they are told, that the
Tribune Company gets their "cut" of the Coke billion dollars a year
ad bucks, or else, more judicial dirt and Cellini scandals will be published.
So what is next? The WORLD GREEDIEST NEWSPAPER suddenly and
belatedly finding out that there is an insurance scam reportedly implicating a
marketing adjunct of Coca-Cola? Or that DDB advertising agency is concealing an
apparent horrendous price-fixing mess involving both Pepsi and Coke?.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario